Reinterpreting Hadiths Prohibiting Depiction of Living Beings through Gadamerian Hermeneutics in the Avatar Da'wah Trend
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35719/amn.v11i2.216Kata Kunci:
Digital Da'wah, Avatar , Prohibition Hadith on Drawing, Gadamer's HermeneuticsAbstrak
This article reexamines the hadith prohibiting the depiction of living creatures within the contemporary digital da'wah landscape, which increasingly relies on visual representation, particularly through the use of avatars. This hadith has often been understood textually and ahistorically, creating tension between religious norms and modern digital communication practices. This study examines the construction of the normative meaning of the hadith prohibiting drawing within the historical context of early Islam and how this meaning can be reinterpreted and contextualized within contemporary visual da'wah practices through the hermeneutical approach of Hans-Georg Gadamer. The method employed a qualitative approach based on library research, examining thematic hadiths, classical and modern scholarly commentary, and philosophical hermeneutics literature. The analysis is conducted through a hermeneutic dialogue between the text's horizon and the contemporary reader, emphasizing the historical-affective consciousness and the fusion of horizons. The study's results reveal that the prohibition served as a theological mechanism to maintain the purity of monotheism in early Islamic societies that still tended toward the cult of visual symbols. The use of avatar images in digital da'wah can be understood as a functional and communicative representational medium, not as a theological expression, as long as it does not contain elements of glorification or deviation from the creed. The novelty lies in the application of Gadamer's hermeneutics as an analytical framework to bridge the normative authority of hadith with the practice of avatar-based visual da'wah. These findings strengthen the methodology of hadith contextualization in addressing the dynamics of digital visual culture.
Unduhan
Referensi
Abdullah, M. Amin. Islamic Studies di Perguruan Tinggi: Pendekatan Integratif-Interkonektif. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2012.
_______. “New Horizons of Islamic Studies through Socio-Cultural Hermeneutics.” Al-Jami'ah: Journal of Islamic Studies 41, no. 1 (2003): 1-24. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajis.2003.411.1-24.
al-‘Asqalānī, Ibn Ḥajar. Fatḥ al-Bārī bi Sharḥ Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī. Beirut: Dār al-Ma‘rifah, n.d.
Al-Bukhārī, Muḥammad ibn Ismā‘īl al-Ju‘fī. Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī. Beirut: Dār Ṭawq al-Najāh, 1422 H.
Al-Nawawī. Sharḥ Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim. Beirut: Dār al-Minhāj, 2010.
Al-Naysābūrī, Muslim ibn al-Ḥajjāj. Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim, Kitāb al-Libās wa al-Zīnah. Beirut: Dār Iḥyā’ al-Turāth al-‘Arabī, n.d.
Al-Qaraḍāwī, Yūsuf. Al-Ḥalāl wa al-Ḥarām fī al-Islām. Cairo: Maktabah Wahbah, 1994.
Al-Shāṭibī, Abū Isḥāq. Al-Muwāfaqāt fī Uṣūl al-Sharī‘ah. Beirut: Dār al-Ma‘rifah, n.d.
Amir, Abdul Muiz, Sahiron Syamsuddin, and Siswanto Masruri. “Dialectic Relationship between the Qur’an and Hadith: The Interpretation of the Term ‘As-Sā‘ah’ Using Critical Hermeneutic Analysis.” Jurnal Adabiyah 21, no. 1 (2021): 57–81. https://doi.org/10.24252/jad.v21i1a4.
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Philosophical Hermeneutics. Translated by David E. Linge. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1976.
_______. Truth and Method. Translated by Joel Weinsheimer and Donald G. Marshall. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2013.
Ibn Anas, Mālik. Al-Muwaṭṭa’. Beirut: Dār Iḥyā’ al-Turāth al-‘Arabī, n.d.
Ibn Bāz, ‘Abd al-‘Azīz. Majmū‘ Fatāwā wa Maqālāt Mutanawwi‘ah. Riyadh: Dār al-Qāsim, 1996.
Malpas, Jeff. "Hans-Georg Gadamer." The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Edited by Edward N. Zalta & Uri Nodelman. Fall 2025 Edition. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2025/entries/gadamer.
Manik, Zulfirman, Annisa Br. Munthe, Mhd. Fakhrianda Zusrika Rambe, Roby Hanifan Hidayah Siregar, and Tiara Karlia Salsabila. “Mediatization of Da’wah Hadith in the Digital Age: An Analysis of @risyad_bay’s TikTok Account.” Sufiya: Journal of Islamic Studies 1, no. 2 (2025): 87–102. https://journal.sufiya.org/index.php/sjis/article/view/128.
Maulidiyah, Izatul Muhidah, and Aida Mushbirotus Zahro. “Telaah Perbandingan Metode Tafsir Maqasidi dan Ma’na Cum Maghza dalam Penafsiran al-Qur’an.” Jurnal Moderasi: The Journal of Ushuluddin and Islamic Thought, and Muslim Societies 1, no. 2 (2021): 149-168. https://doi.org/10.14421/jm.2021.12.03.
Mufid, Abdul. “The Revolution of the Qur’anic Interpretation: Criticism of Jamal al-Banna’s Methodology in 1920–2013.” Religia 23, no. 1 (2020): 117–149. https://doi.org/10.28918/religia.v23i1.1958.
Mustaqim, Abdul. Ilmu Ma‘ānī al-Ḥadīth: Paradigma Interkoneksi Berbasis Kontekstualisasi. Yogyakarta: Idea Press, 2016.
Qudratullah, Qudratullah, and Syahrianti Syam. “Transformation of Da’wah through Digital Space,” Advances in Digital Transformation - Rise of Ultra-Smart Fully Automated Cyberspace, IntechOpen (2024). https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.1004208.
Rabbat, Nasser. “The Innocence of the Image: Representations of the Prophet in the Islamic Tradition,” Artforum 53, no. 8 (2015). https://www.artforum.com/features/the-innocence-of-the-image-representations-of-the-prophet-in-the-islamic-tradition-223421.
Syamsuddin, Sahiron. “Ma’na-Cum-Maghza Approach to the al-Qur’an: Interpretation of Q. 5:51.” Proceedings of the International Conference on Qur'an and Hadith Studies (ICQHS) 137 (2017): 131-136. https://doi.org/10.2991/icqhs-17.2018.21.
_______. “Pendekatan Ma’na Cum Maghza dalam Penafsiran al-Qur’an.” Public lecture, December 2, 2022. Live streaming by Iatsenja Cirebon. YouTube, 1:50:50. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rLFNjHwOgcQ&t=4691s.
_______. Hermeneutika dan Pengembangan Ulumul Qur’an. Yogyakarta: Pesantren Nawesea Press, 2009.
Wahid, Soleh Hasan. “Exploring the Intersection of Islam and Digital Technology: A Bibliometric Analysis.” Social Sciences & Humanities Open 10 (2024): 101085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.101085.
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Cara Mengutip
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2025 Zubeir Ahmad Nasution, Lilia Ulya Amalia, Muhammad Fitriyadi, Agustiar, Akrimi Matswah

Artikel ini berlisensi Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
1. Author’s Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by the stated author/s, has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author, and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
2. Miscellaneous
Al-Manar will publish the article (or have it published) in the journal if its editorial process is successfully completed and Al-Manar or its sublicensee has become obligated to publish it. Al-Manar may conform the article to a style of punctuation, spelling, capitalization, and usage that it deems appropriate.
Copyright
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under an Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) that allows others to share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material.
This work is based on licensed under Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).






